[HOME] - [NEWS] - [MY CARTOONS] - [MY COMIC BOOK] - [MY MOVIES] - [MY PAPERS] - [HISTORICAL ESSAYS]

FACEBOOK IS RACIST AND VIOLATING REDLINING LAWS

Redlining was a practice used throughout the civil rights era to keep African-Americans from living in certain areas. Banks would refuse to give loans to black or brown people not based on their finances but based on their skin color. Redlining is a racist practice the illuminati introduced in America to keep racism going during the civil rights movement.

Illuminati company facebook is bringing back the practice of redlining but this time in a high tech way. Now certain housing companies are blocking people of certain races from ever seeing their ads. Black and brown people are being discriminated against by facebook through their advertising procedures. Fakebook is using people's race to deny them housing opportunities.

The Fair Housing Act, enacted in 1968, expressly outlaws refusal to sell or rent housing based on race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development brought a complaint against Facebook for violating the Fair Housing Act by allowing landlords and home sellers to use its advertising platform to engage in housing discrimination. Facebook enables advertises to display ads either only to men or women, not show ads to Facebook users interested in an "assistance dog," "mobility scooter," "accessibility" or "deaf culture"; not show ads to users whom Facebook categorizes as interested in "child care" or "parenting," or show ads only to users with children above a specified age; not display ads to users whom Facebook categorizes as interested in a particular place of worship, religion or tenet, such as the "Christian Church," "Sikhism," "Hinduism," or the "Bible;" not show ads to users whom Facebook categorizes as interested in "Latin America," "Canada," "Southeast Asia," "China," "Honduras," or "Somalia;" and draw a red line around zip codes and then not display ads to Facebook users who live in specific zip codes.

The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a statement of interest, joined in by HUD, in U.S. District Court on behalf of a number of private litigants challenging Facebook's advertising platform.

HUD’s investigation into Facebook began in late 2016 following the publication of a ProPublica article that described how Facebook had enabled advertisers to exclude—in an apparent violation of federal law—categories of users based on what Facebook termed “Ethnic Affinities.”

Facebook provided realtors, for example, with ad-targeting options that allowing them to “narrow” their ads to excluded, among others, black, Hispanic, and Asian Americans. The ad-targeting mechanism may have also allowed realtors—or homeowners looking to rent out or sell their own properties—to exclude people with disabilities as well.

Facebook's advertising platform violates the Fair Housing Act which was enacted to stop the practice of redlining by banks. Ben Carson - who isn't even African-American but a dark illuminati Jew - is allowing this complete descruction of the Fair Housing Act. Donald Trump was sued for Redlining early on in his real estate career. Trump's father made his entire fortune on redlining like practices.

Trump's father would buy building with lots of black tenants and then force them out of the building. He would then resell the building as a "white" apartment building for a lot more money because of Redlining practices.

“Secretary Carson has directed HUD’s Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity to re-open its investigation into Facebook’s advertising practices,” said Jereon Brown, HUD’s general deputy secretary for public affairs.

Added Brown: “Since our initial investigation, we have learned more about these practices that warrant a deeper level of scrutiny. At this point, we are resuming an investigation and have made no findings in this matter.”

HUD’s investigation into Facebook began in late 2016 following the publication of a ProPublica article that described how Facebook had enabled advertisers to exclude—in an apparent violation of federal law—categories of users based on what Facebook termed “Ethnic Affinities.”

Facebook provided realtors, for example, with ad-targeting options that allowing them to “narrow” their ads to excluded, among others, black, Hispanic, and Asian Americans. The ad-targeting mechanism may have also allowed realtors—or homeowners looking to rent out or sell their own properties—to exclude people with disabilities as well.

The Fair Housing Act, enacted in 1968, expressly outlaws refusal to sell or rent housing based on race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.

In November, Facebook said in a statement that it had installed “safeguards” to prevent advertisers from excluding users based on their race and ethnicity, but that a “technical glitch” had allowed the practice to continue.

Thee investigation into Facebook’s advertising practices was terminated, according to the Times, as part of a broader effort at HUD to scale back enforcement of fair-housing laws. Specifically, Anna Maria Farías, head of HUD’s Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity division, is said to have ordered a hold on roughly a half-dozen investigations.

Grilled on Wednesday over who ultimately ordered the investigation squashed by Sen. Brian Schatz, Democrat of Hawaii, Carson was characteristically at a loss for words, visibly straining to hold back the names of subordinates involved:

Sen. Brian Schatz: Were you involved personally in the decision to terminate the Facebook investigation?

Sec. Ben Carson: I gave, uh, and I give all of my people the degree of independence that they need, but I will tell you that….

Schatz: Whose decision was this?

Carson: I think we jointly agreed that was the thing to do at that time.

Schatz: But I mean, you have a hierarchy right? And there are certain authorities and certain assistant secretaries and professional staff. Was this your decision?

Carson: Well, the secretary is responsible for all decisions, regardless of who made them.

Schatz: But who made the decision?

Carson: (long pause) The decision was made… at a level other than myself but I gave permission for the decision to be made.

Schatz: And what level is that?

Carson: The assistant secretary.

When further pressed by Schatz on what basis the investigation was terminated, Carson pointed to both time and workload constraints—neither of which, notably, was an issue for his predecessor, Julián Castro, who made fair housing a lead priority at HUD.

“We didn’t really have time to study them, so we wanted to really pull them back and have a chance to study,” said Carson, adding, to Schatz’s apparent surprise, that HUD was once again investigating Facebook.

“The investigation is open again?” Schatz replied.

“It is,” Carson said.

“Is this the first we’re hearing about it?” Schatz asked.

“It may well be,” Carson said.

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.