Sarah Jeong has recently been hired by the Jew York Times despite leaving a long history on social media of racist statements against white people.

Sarah Jeong is a literal mental retard Satanist. She murders little children, especially young white boys. Her entire "intellectual" career is fake. She is a spoiled Yakuza illuminati brat who eats shit. Sarah is one of the stupidest people in the world. The illuminati faked her degrees at Berkeley and Harvard Law School because she's supposed to be the smart jap monkey.

Sarah is a Jap hoax. They have been grooming her to be this white hatred machine since she was born. The NYT's (controlled by the Rothschild Jews) is giving her this platform because they're all part of the illuminati NWO. Her job is to sow racial hatred in America via the NYTs.

Sarah has a tail and she hates anyone who doesn't have a tail. Sarah is not just a racist, she actually hates all humans. She is not human. She is descended from neandthal tree pygmies. She's descended from neanderthal monkeys.

Ever since she's gotten out of Law School, Sarah's spouted Japanese racist propaganda. She is a Japanese spy and paid to say racist things about white people. Now the New York Times is having the Japanese make them hire someone who's sole job is to insult white people and say they should all die. Sarah is obsessed with white people and the notion that they are responsible for most of what is wrong with America.

Here's a wall of some of Sarah Jeong's comments:

If you substitute "black" for "white" here, Sarah's pronouncements about white people are clearly racist. No one would argue the statements below aren't racist.

"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants."

"Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old black men."

"If you get on wikipedia and you play "Things black people can definitley atke credit for," it's really hard.


.@RepDanMode........ Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This was my plan all along. (Devil Face)

And yet, when the same things are said about white people they are treated like some sort of culture critique. Sarah pretends like hatred is insightful when all it is is racist hatred. And the New York Times seems happy to go along with it.

Fascist New York Times won't even allow their own employees to criticize Illuminati Sarah Jeong. New York Times features writer Elizabeth Williamson had to delete a tweet that criticized the paper's controversial new hire Sarah Jeong.

Williamson, who is based in the paper's Washington bureau, originally had tweeted out a link to a column by opinion writer Bret Stephens about Jeong's hiring. "Here's @BretStephensNYT offering a classy welcome to a colleague who has yet to prove she deserves one," Williamson wrote.

Anyone who doesn't believe that white people can be the target of discrimination and racism is a fool. All sorts of groups are racist. Irish immigrants in America used to be called white niggers. Racism is not just a sin of white people. The Japanese and Koreans are the most racist of all.

Sarah Jeong would say horrible things about black people but she knows she can't get away with that. She can say racist things about white people and the alt-left cheers. Sarah is a horrible racist of the worst sort. She is the moral equivalent of reporter who supports David Duke. The New York Times would never hire a reporter who expressed sympathy for David Duke, why are they hiring Sarah Jeong?

Several months earlier The Times withdrew its offer of an editorial board slot to one Quinn Norton because it was learned that she had Tweeted some remarks that could be interpreted as anti-black and anti-gay, although in context were not as blatantly racist as Ms. Jeong’s were. Obviously, the New York Times thinks racism is OK as long as white people are the victims of it.

The New York Times issued a statement defending its hiring of Jeong, claiming that she was responding to online harassment "by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers ... She regrets it and The Times does not condone it." This is horrible logic that displays an embarassing lack of mental sophistication on the part of the New York Times. Since when is it OK to say that abusing others is OK because someone has been abused by others?

Part of Sarah's hatred of white people is that she was raped by a white group of men. Would Sarah raping a young white boy be OK since she was raped by a group of white men? Since when New York Times, is it permissable to abuse others because you were abused? Sounds suspiciously like Catholic Illuminati logic. And if Sarah regrets the statements, why hasn't she ever apologized herself for what she wrote OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN????

Obviously the New York Time is spouting a bunch of bullshit like half of their reporting. They are one of the worst soures of reliable information. Nothing they write is ever really the truth. They work directly for the illuminati peddling their lies and hiding their secrets for them. They are as dumb and useless as Fox News just with snooty NYC snobbishness added.

It is simply false to excuse anti-white racism on the grounds that people of color lack power. This argument confuses the gravity of an offense with the existence of the offense. A powerless person’s hate may not harm the powerful, but it is still hate.

Vox (who was Sarah Jeong's former employer before her new job at the NYTs) defends Sarah against this charge by claiming that "white people" is just a way of talking about "the man". To Quote Zack Beauchamp's apology of Jeong:

"“White people” is a shorthand in these communities, one that’s used to capture the way that many whites still act in clueless and/or racist ways. It’s typically used satirically and hyperbolically to emphasize how white people continue to benefit (even unknowingly) from their skin color, or to point out the ways in which a power structure that favors white people continues to exist."

This is alt-left bullshit that makes no sense at all. Saying #CancelWhitePeople is not a way of discussing the power structure. #DestroyPatriarchy #DestroyInstitutionalRacism those would be statements against the power structure. CANCEL WHITE PEOPLE isn't a criticism, it's a racist declaration. "White People have all stopped breeding.. Just what I planned" is not a criticism of the power structure, it's a eugenic racist thing to say. If Jews were in place of white people, it's something a neo-nazi would say.

None of Sarah Jeong's statements are saying anything critical of the power structure. Is Sarah even the right person to be criticizing the power structure? She's an entitled rich spoiled brat who went to Harvard and has never worked a real day in her life. Asian people - compared to blacks, Jews or Native Americans - don't experience the same levels of racism in America. What is she complaining about? When has she ever been disenfranchized by the "white man?" Did they giver her less money at Harvard beause she was Asian?

Beauchamp's apologist screed isn't conistent with the NYT's own admission that Sarah's statements are abusive behavior learned from her abusers and something she regrets and the New York Times does not endorse.

The reality is that the Japanese illumianti just want a platform to say racist things towards white people and Sarah is their "girl" (even though she's a hermaphrodite without a vagina who is a gay man according to her DNA test.) The illuminati is trying to create a group of racist asians in America who they can later expoit against white Americans in a race war. Sarah is their spokesman.